The more than 3000 year
long history of Ancient Egypt has been divided into 8 or 9 periods, sometimes
called Kingdoms. This modern-day division is somewhat arbitrarily based
on the country's unity and wealth and the power of the central government. The
Ancient Egyptians themselves did not group their rulers according to such
criteria. They rather seem to have developed the notion of dynasties
throughout their history. The Palermo Stone simply lists the kings one after the other, without any apparent
need of grouping them. The Turin King list, which is more recent, has grouped the kings according to their discordance
or origin. Thus, Amenemhat I and his descendants are described as the kings of
Itj-Tawi, the capital whence they ruled. We owe the division into 30 dynasties
as we use it now to Manetho, an Egyptian priest who lived at the beginning of the Ptolemaic
Era. In many cases, however, it is not clear why Manetho has grouped some kings
into one dynasty and other kings into another. The 18th Dynasty, for instance,
starts with Ahmose, a brother of the last king in Manetho's 17th Dynasty. Theoretically,
Ahmose and Kamose should thus have been grouped in the same dynasty. Thutmosis
I, on the other hand, does not appear to have been related to his predecessor,
Amenhotep I, but still both kings are grouped in the 18th Dynasty.
Some Egyptologists have attempted to
abandon the notions of Kingdoms and dynasties, but for the sake
of conformity with most publications dealing with Ancient Egypt, this site will
continue using both notions. Visitors may, however, notice that the timeline
below and the timescale used throughout The Ancient Egypt Site may be
somewhat different from some of the other books or web-sites they have
consulted.
Visitors should also be
aware that, as is the case with any publication dealing with Ancient Egypt,
dates are approximations and should not be taken literally. In many cases it is
not known just how long a king may have ruled. Comparing different publications
on the history and chronology of Ancient Egypt, visitors may notice that one
king may be credited with a fairly short reign in one publication and a fairly
long in another. This impacts the absolute chronology, that is to say, Egyptian
history using our year numbering.
In The Ancient Egypt Site,
some dates will be proposed but again, they should only be seen as approximations
and not as absolutes. A discussion on the length of the reign of a king may
follow and this discussion may show the likelihood that this king reigned
longer or shorter than the dates linked to his reign.
It can thus not be stressed enough
that the provided dates are just a frame of reference helping readers to gain
insight in the sequence of events and occurrences and to have an approximate
idea of the age of certain monuments and artifacts.
No comments:
Post a Comment